Remember a few weeks back when you voted for what direction our modern cabover pickup truck would take? Well, in the end it wasn’t even close. Close infers a certain proximity, or nearness. In the final adding up of your choices, first place was so far ahead it was enjoying after dinner cocktails while second place was still putting its makeup on. The runaway winner by a landslide was the ‘friendly’ version, followed by the ‘junior semi’ in second place with about half as many votes. In the interests of democratic transparency, I went through the comments and gave a whole vote for first choice and half for second choice, with a two-taillight margin of error.
[Editor’s Note: I’m kind of delighted to see anything related to “friendly” a winner in the context of pickup truck design. – JT]
It’s important for a designer to have a clear idea of exactly what kind of vehicle they want before they start sketching, even within a given brief. For example remember our EV All-American Wagon? We wanted that to be traditional, without being overtly retro. It could have been super modern or had a raised ride height and still fit the criteria, but that wasn’t what we were going for.
In the case of our cabover, I wanted something that combined utility with civility, like a Maverick but with more practicality. A slick modern car alternative that could be a daily driver and didn’t make you feel like you were on your way to a construction site when you were going to Costco on a Sunday afternoon. Like a minivan, but with an open bed instead of an enclosed space full of squabbling kids trashing the interior trim.
Lots of you were very sharp and mentioned crash regulations, and expressed a preference for your legs not forming part of the crumple zone. Wimps. I saw a (road legal!) Porsche 962 over the weekend. Do you think Derek Bell used to moan about his feet being in line with the front axle? No, he just put his foot down and got on with it.
The truth is you probably couldn’t currently get a traditional cabover through passenger car crash tests. If you look at the Volkswagen ID Buzz, it’s just a very flat fronted minivan shape. The drivers door and front seats are all well behind the front axle line. You could angle the windshield a bit more upright but that wouldn’t gain you anything in the way of usable space. It’s not only crash structure that has to be considered though; modern vehicles have airbags, complex HVAC systems, and multiple control units stuffed into and behind the instrument panel.
So we’ll have to take a bit of a creative leap of faith here. I did consider bringing the front wheels forward and moving the H-Point (hip point, or how the drivers seating position is determined) rearwards, but I thought that wouldn’t really be in the spirit of the exercise and what we were trying to achieve.
I mentioned about wanting a total length of about 190”, and after overlaying a couple of different images of other cars for scale, I think we’re in the ball park. A few people mentioned having space behind the seats for interior storage, and I agree. Not a jump seat or anything, just a nice warm dry secure area for stuff you don’t want to put in the bed. Like your jacket or your lunch. It does eat into bed length a bit but it’s a worthwhile trade off, as you’re going to be using it more often than the full bed. I used to have an R56 Mini Cooper Clubman and I used that little third door all the time. Design is always a compromise – you can never have everything you want.
But our cabover has a party trick as can be seen in the second image above. The sides and the rear of the bed can all fold down, and in the case of the rear panel lock into a horizontal position, to extend the cargo area. The red line indicates how long the bed is normally, and you can see it’s about half the total length. If our truck is 190”, that would give us a bed length of about 80” knocking off a bit for the bulkhead. I don’t know what you freaks are going to do with all that, but at least you have it.
Finally we have the waist locker, something that’s been around in various forms in the past and has recently made a comeback with the Rivian thanks to it’s unique architecture. Again, it’s a useful lockable dry space but for stuff you might not want to keep in the cabin, or a sort of chuck stuff in and forget it’s there box, like you might use for tools or something.
Not that any Autopian Motors vehicle needs tools of course – our build quality is fourth to none and our reliability record is exemplary. Each car is signed off by our Chief Arbiter of Vehicle Quality, David Tracy, who doesn’t know a quality car when he sees it.
I appreciate it, however it needs:
A face not made of 3M.
I will not have DRLs on my car.
I want sidewalls on my car.
It has no paint. Usability is limited.
Looks good. Kudos on the design.
I ride on cabover Toyota Hiaces every once in a while. It’s a strange feeling sitting over the front wheels while doing 70. You can’t help thinking that your femurs are now part of the crash structure. Always unsettling over the first few miles, and then it wears off.
Judge Dredd would love it.
I am THE LAW.
But that’s just it… it’s just cabover styling, with zero of the actual benefits. Aero dynamically it’s likely worse than a more traditional design with a hood/windshield, and from a driver’s perspective it’s DEFINITELY worse, as the windshield is so far ahead you won’t be able to see traffic lights, and the A pillars will be in your way while driving.
Cabovers are neat, but cabover proportions with modern safety SEATING locations result in something that is pretending to be something it’s not. Good design is honest. Faux cabovers are not honest.
I think the best we can get is a bullnose, which is still pretty cool but still not a cabover.
You’ve missed the part where this is an actual cabover, which is why I mentioned the ID Buzz and it’s seating/door position in the article, as a comparison.
” I did consider bringing the front wheels forward and moving the H-Point (hip point, or how the drivers seating position is determined) rearwards, but I thought that wouldn’t really be in the spirit of the exercise and what we were trying to achieve.”
Love the “interior storage area behind seats”. In particular, it’s awesome that you can access it from outside the truck.
When you include something really useful like that, without wanting to sound like a wanker designer it really deepens your emotional bond with the product if you use it all the time.
Now back having a 4 door, after 3 years of a 2 door, I’m back in the habit of just opening a rear door and chucking bag/jacket/shopping etc on the rear passenger floor, instead of fart arsing around trying to get in and then heave it all into the passenger footwell.
The answer to this puzzle is simple: VW should build the pickup version of the ID Buzz.
Like everything else, it’s probably the best compromise for what we’re dreaming of today.
It’s one of those ideas that seems like a no brainer. But they have the new Amarok coming (which is coming stateside this time I think?). But obviously ID Buzz pick up would be a lot less rugged and a lot more lifestyle, so I can see both sides.
One thing I GUARANTEE you is they have sketched it in the studio, and may even have gone up to full size model. In fact, given VWs resources, I’d put the mortgage on it.
They’ve already shown off a rendering:
https://www.topgear.com/car-news/first-look/vw-has-been-toying-idea-id-buzz-pickup
True, based on an older concept of the BuZz, but still, they’ve as much as said, we will build it if you guys want it.
This isn’t just like the Canoo pickup, it basically is the Canoo – down to the fold-flat sides, the waist locker, the pseudo-suicide (pseudo-cide?) doors. I had to check the date to see if it was April 1st.
https://www.canoo.com/pickup
I’m really hoping the Canoo actually makes it to production. I’m really afraid that the odds of owning the Canoo pickup aren’t that much higher than this one, and I would really like one.
I give canoo about a 2.5% chance of making it, sadly.
I really like some of their ideas, hope I’m wrong…
And the Canoo is really just a modern Type II. This has a longer bed without an extension, rear cab storage accessible from the outside, and a door to access a storage area rather than a drawer that pops out. Canoo has the frunk as well. There’s only so much you can do with a cab over pick-up with modern need for aerodynamics. I think that this is a good and different enough design to be its own thing.
The Canoo is not a cabover.
Fair enough – however, as you mentioned, a true cabover likely wouldn’t pass NHTSA crash tests. The Canoo is where that compromise gets you. Anyway, I quite liked your design in many of the ways that I also liked the Canoo truck. And, as another commenter pointed out, yours is just as likely to be built.
A bed of 80″ is going to be a hair over the normal short-bed length, which is good. Unfortunately it means you’ll need to get creative with hauling anything like drywall or plywood, but it works.
With those proportions, what sort of width do you get? A sheet of plywood is 4’x8′ and is usually a good marker for what a truck (even a smaller truck) can do. Look into what tricks the Ford Maverick has to reliably carry plywood.
That may be one of those design vs execution fights, though.
Its a good evolution of the former Friendly version.
Well, there’s no wheel arch intrusion so yeah 4×8′ should fit with the rear tailgate in the horizontal position.
Imagine this as a Maverick, but with a longer bed!
While I like the look of cabovers, I’d prefer that my feet avoid the things that happened to Rick Mears’ feet.
And Johnny Herbert, and Martin Brundle to name another two lucky to be walking off the top of my head.
Jesus what’s wrong with me.
This looks a lot like the Canoo Pickup Truck.
Yup, 100%
So what you’re saying is, this truck is a little… sketchy?
Chortle chortle.
I love drop side pickups, and a cabover makes it great!
I like imagine each vehicle comes with a bag of rust chips courtesy of David. Just to get you started.
It’s one of the complimentary gifts you receive at vehicle handover. Along with a Torch plushie.