Home » Some Decent Cars: 1992 Ford Aerostar vs 2000 Toyota Camry Solara SLE V6

Some Decent Cars: 1992 Ford Aerostar vs 2000 Toyota Camry Solara SLE V6

Aerostar Vs Solara

Welcome back to Shitbox Showdown, where we act like we have infinite space to adopt used cars. Today, we’re jetting off to the west coast in search of some decent cars in decent shape. Oh yes, we’re going sensible for a minute. But first, let’s have a look at how our Aussie showdown went.

Holden Vs Ford Final

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Falcon has smashed it out of the park. Not only does it look much cleaner than the Commodore, it’s in desirable S trim and packs a modern five-speed manual gearbox. Anyway, welcome to Los Angeles, a place where everyone is someone and old cars seem to just keep living. Lack of road salt and moisture means that old cars out here are often structurally sound, making them great choices for fly-and-drive adventures. What better to fly-and-drive than cars that pack reliable reputations to make it all the way back home? Yes, we’re temporarily ditching the excessively sketchy tat and going for genuinely usable and interesting cars.

Vidframe Min Top
Vidframe Min Bottom

1992 Ford Aerostar – $1,900

Aerostar 1

Engine/drivetrain: Three-liter V6, four-speed automatic gearbox, rear-wheel-drive.

ADVERTISEMENT
Ad Placeholder Wide Top Banner

Location: Buena Park, California

Odometer reading: 75,841 miles

Runs/drives? Yes

After having been beaten to the punch by the iconic first-generation Chrysler minivans, Ford needed to cook up something with some serious family appeal. It landed on the Aerostar, a sleek garageable van with a respectable maximum towing capacity of 5,000 pounds. Ford even compared the van to the Space Shuttle in ads, a campaign that had to be pulled due to sad and obvious reasons. Despite the Aerostar never achieving the same success as the Chrysler vans, it’s still bristling with suburban nostalgia.

Aerostar 2

ADVERTISEMENT
Ad Placeholder Wide Top Banner

While the Aerostar packed an array of nifty available drivetrain choices, this one seems fairly standard. Packing a three-liter Vulcan V6 mated to a four-speed automatic gearbox, this low-tech 145-horsepower lump will keep plodding away until the heat death of the universe. Unfortunately, the A4LD automatic gearbox doesn’t have quite the same stellar reputation for reliability, but it’s a fairly cheap gearbox to rebuild in the event that something does go wrong.

Aerostar 3

From a quick glance of the classified ad, it looks like this Aerostar was well and truly loved. The owners had thought to save a copy of the window sticker and keep a Chilton’s manual on hand for DIY servicing. Sure, the clearcoat looks a bit faded and there’s an unsightly gash on the left rear corner, but that looks to be all the exterior imperfections on this remarkably well-kept family hauler.

Aerostar 4

Things look pretty good inside the Aerostar as well, with a bolster tear on the driver’s seat and a grubby steering wheel being really the only indications of this van’s age. The dashboard looks to have survived the SoCal sun, the rear seats look to have survived life as a family vehicle, and the whole thing just looks grand. As it should with a mere five digits on the digital odometer. Even the air-conditioning is said to work, which means that this thing should be ready to roll.

ADVERTISEMENT
Ad Placeholder Wide Top Banner

2000 Toyota Camry Solara SLE V6 – $2,200

Camry Solara 1

Engine/drivetrain: Three-liter quad-cam V6, four-speed automatic gearbox, front-wheel-drive.

Location: Pacoima, California

Odometer reading: 152,788 miles

Runs/drives? It’s a Camry, isn’t it?

ADVERTISEMENT
Ad Placeholder Wide Top Banner

While a low-mileage Ford Aerostar is very cool, maybe you’re in the mood for something more performance-oriented without venturing into the zone of questionable reliability. No problem, the Toyota Camry Solara should be just the thing. Not only does the Warren J. Crain styling of this first-generation Solara hold up well, it’s an SLE V6 model, so it gets such treats as perforated leather upholstery, automatic climate control, and a 200-watt JBL audio system.

Camry Solara 4

The three-liter 1MZ-FE in this Camry Solara is still one of the smoothest V6 engines ever fitted to a production car and puts out a very respectable 200 horsepower and 214 lb.-ft. of torque. While some owners have experienced sludge on this particular engine, frequent oil changes are often enough to keep the nastiness at bay. Power goes to the front wheels through a fairly robust four-speed automatic, not exactly the most engaging gearbox but certainly a smooth one. We’re looking at a genuine double cream personal luxury coupe here with power to cruise at 80 mph all day.

Camry Solara 2

On the outside, time hasn’t been saintly to this Camry Solara. The condition of the paint on the rear bumper and right quarter panel is quite poor, suggesting rear corner damage hiding in this car’s history. Still, it’s worth wet-sanding to see if any shine can be brought back, and a clean title is generally a good sign. On the plus side, the rest of the paint appears to be in decent shape for the car’s age, and the sunroof seems to work, perfect for crafting a vibe.

ADVERTISEMENT
Ad Placeholder Wide Top Banner

Camry Solara 3

Move to the interior and the news gets quite a bit better. The leather seats and plastic panels all look to be in great shape considering the car’s age, with the rear seat looking as if it’s hardly ever been used. The factory head unit hasn’t been unceremoniously chucked in the bin, and even the cup holder lids seem to be working as intended. Plus, take a look at how nice that carpet looks. What’s more, the seller states that the air-con blows cold, meaning you should be set for comfortable motoring behind the wheel of this stylish Camry.

So here we are, two no-nonsense rides that should prove to be practical daily drivers with reasonable reliability. One’s a surprisingly well-kept van, the other is the pinnacle of the Camry circa 2000. As ever, choose wisely.

(Photo credits: Craigslist sellers)

ADVERTISEMENT
Ad Placeholder Wide Top Banner

Relatedbar

Australian Civil War: 1980 Holden Commodore vs 1989 Ford Falcon S

There Was A Time When You Could Get A Ford Minivan With Rear-Wheel-Drive And A Manual Transmission: Holy Grails

The 2023 Toyota Crown Is A Crossover Sedan That Isn’t Boring Despite The Fact That Toyota Sedans And Crossovers Usually Are

Seven Cheap Cars I’d Be Tempted To Buy Right Now If Enough People Became Autopian Members

ADVERTISEMENT
Ad Placeholder Wide Top Banner

Watch Travis Pastrana Go Full Florida Man And Put The Goofy Fun Back Into Gymkhana

Got a hot tip? Send it to us here. Or check out the stories on our homepage.

Support our mission of championing car culture by becoming an Official Autopian Member.

Facebook
WhatsApp
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
37 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Captain Avatar
Captain Avatar
1 year ago

The Solara.

The Aerostar will also have specific use and people who will need it, but the Solara has more parts availability and is much better to drive and ride in (my dad had an Aerostar….so…..I’m not a fan)

Iwannadrive637
Iwannadrive637
1 year ago

This is one of the few times that I like both vehicles. If I need to put some TLC into either one it might as well be fun to drive. Toyota.

37
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x